Contents of Materials Performance - APR 2012

Materials Performance is the world's most widely circulated magazine dedicated to corrosion prevention and control. MP provides information about the latest corrosion control technologies and practical applications for every industry and environment.

Page 34 of 76

CP BLOG Continued from page 31
nuity testing should be performed to minimize chances of interference. Careful consideration must given to buried infra- structure, such as ductile iron piping with unbonded joints, isolated metallic storm culverts, and foreign pipelines adjacent to WZ QVKWUQVO \W \PM [Q\M 1 _W]TL LMÅVQ\MTa rule out the 100 mV shift criterion, as dis- similar metals are likely to be involved.
tial of the metal more anodic of the coupling.
A
Potential reading and test hole location
Q
In our plant complex, we have a huge under-
ground piping network. For the past 15 years, this net-
work has been protected by an impressed
In the case where several metals are in electrical contact in an electrolyte, the protection poten- tial must be the protection poten-
current cathodic protection (ICCP) system. Our normal monitoring procedure is po- tential measurement through a number of test holes randomly distributed over the plant. There are no special cables con- nected to each pipeline for each test hole to measure the potential by a copper/ copper sulfate (Cu/CuSO4
) reference elec-
trode (CSE). We connect the voltmeter to the exposed grounding network cables that are connected to the steel structures and all underground piping. I have the following
questions about this system: z Is using the exposed grounding cables effective for obtaining the CP potential measurements on the piping, and does this method give the actual data?
z If the test hole is located between two underground pipelines, what potential reading will we get—the actual for each, the average, or something else?
z What is the extent of the IR drop problem in this case?
z If I connect one terminal of the
voltmeter to one grounding cable, can I measure the potential in sev- eral test holes around that ground- ing cable because I know that all the underground piping is connected to the grounding network?
A Following are my answers to
these questions: z Yes, this method is effective because the grounding grid is
connected to the underground piping network and belongs to the same protected structures.
z and z You will obtain the average of the
readings, but you must be careful because of the distance between where you put the half-cell and where the pipes are located. If the distance is too large, you will measure the pipe potential plus an IR component because the soil is between the half-cell and the pipes. Remember that placing the half-cell closer to the pipe gives the best pipe- to-soil (P/S) potential.
32 MATERIALS PERFORMANCE April 2012
NACE International, Vol. 51, No. 4